بيت » مدونة » Cone Crusher vs. كسارة مخروطية

Cone Crusher vs. كسارة مخروطية

In mining, المحاجر, and aggregate production, choosing the right crusher for primary and secondary stages is key to keeping costs down and running operations smoothly. Comparing cone crusher vs gyratory crusher is important for plant managers and engineers. While both use a cone-shaped crushing method, their designs, uses, and working features are quite different.

Cone Crusher vs Gyratory Crusher
Cone Crusher vs Gyratory Crusher

Side-by-Side Technical Comparison

Let’s see the differences at a glance:

ميزةكسارة مخروطيةمخروط محطم
Primary Useالسحق الأساسيسحق ثانوي/ثانوي
Feed Size CapabilityExtra large (up to 1200mm)Medium sized (0-370مم)
الإنتاجيةحتى 5000 TPH45-2130 TPH
Product Shapeخشن, less uniformمكعب, زي مُوحد
AdjustabilityManual, less flexibleHydraulic/Electronic
Maintenance LocationقمةSide or bottom
Setup CostأعلىMore affordable
Installation FootprintكبيرMore compact
Common Models60-109, 54-74, 42-65HST, HPT, CS Series

Cone Crusher vs Gyratory Crusher
كسارة مخروط هيدروليكية متعددة الأسطوانات

How does a cone crusher differ from a Gyratory in plain terms?

Both cone crusher and Gyratory crusher work by crushing rocks between a moving part and a fixed part, but there are some key differences:

  • مقاس & Usage:
    Gyratory crusher is bigger and is mostly used as the first step to crush large, hard rocks in mining. A cone crusher is smaller, often used in later stages to turn smaller rocks into finer material.
  • Shape & Crushing Motion:
    Gyratory crusher has a cone-shaped head that moves in a circular motion inside a deep, rounded bowl. This lets it handle very large pieces and push them down as they get crushed. A cone crusher squeezes rocks between a spinning mantle and a stationary bowl liner, with a movement that’s more elliptical, and it usually has a steeper chamber.
  • What They’re Best At:
    Gyratory crusher is ideal for handling very large, tough rocks at high volumes, usually in the first crushing step. Cone crusher is better for producing smaller, more precise sizes after the big rocks have been broken down, typically in the second or third crushing steps.
  • صيانة & يكلف:
    Gyratory crusher is larger, more complex, and cost more to maintain. Cone crusher tends to be simpler, cheaper to run, and easier to maintain.

Use a gyratory crusher for really big rocks and high capacity at the start of the process; use a cone crusher for smaller rocks and finer output further down the line.

When is a gyratory crusher preferred over a cone crusher?

A gyratory crusher is preferred over a cone crusher when you need to crush very large, tough rocks and require extremely high throughput, especially in primary (first-step) crushing in large mining operations.

Main Reasons to Choose a Gyratory Crusher

  • Big Feed Size: Gyratory crusher handles much larger rock sizes, making them ideal when the incoming material is large boulders that need breaking down.
  • High Capacity: They can process more material per hour than cone crusher, which is necessary for big, busy mines needing fast production.
  • Robustness: Gyratory crusher is built stronger and are better for really hard, abrasive materials that would quickly wear out smaller machines.
  • Continuous Primary Crushing: They’re excellent for the first crushing stage and create a uniform product size for further processing.

When Not To Use?

Gyratory crusher is not the best choice for smaller operations, secondary/tertiary crushing, or when you only need to process smaller pieces—the cone crusher is more efficient, less expensive, and easier to install and maintain in those cases.

كسارة مخروطية
كسارة مخروطية

How throughput capacity compares between gyratory and cone?

Gyratory crusher can handle bigger rocks and havehigher throughput capacity than cone crusher, making them ideal for heavy-duty, high-volume jobs like primary crushing in large mining operations. Cone crusher process smaller material and generally havelower capacity but can produce finer output and are more efficient for secondary or tertiary crushing.

Comparative Table: Throughput Capacity

نوع الكسارةTypical ApplicationMaximum Feed SizeThroughput Capacity
كسارة مخروطيةأساسي, large minesVery large rocksأعلى (up to thousands of tons/hour)
مخروط محطمثانوي, التعليم العاليSmaller rocksأدنى (usually hundreds of tons/hour)
  • Gyratory crusher: Best when the operation demands breaking huge rocks and moving a massive amount of material quickly.
  • Cone crusher: Better for detailed, final shaping and sizing at lower tonnages.

Gyratory crusher is the go-to choice for top-end capacity, while cone crusher excel in finer, more controlled output with less throughput.

Cone Crusher vs Gyratory Crusher
كسارة مخروطية

In-depth Design & Operation Differences

Crushing Mechanism

  • كسارة مخروطية: The entire head moves in a circular motion, providing continuous crushing as large rocks are pressed and broken.
  • مخروط محطم: Utilizes a squeezing action via an oscillating cone, most effective with smaller feed and producing a finer product.

سرعة & Force

  • Gyratory crusher runs at 100–200 RPM, emphasizing throughput over fines.
  • Cone crusher runs faster—typically 500-600 دورة في الدقيقة. This higher mantle speed translates to finer, more evenly graded output.

Chamber & Product Control

Gyratory units have deep chambers and high reduction ratios for big oversized material. Cone units offer variable chamber profiles, CSS (closed-side setting) control, and automated adjustments for product size and shape.

Cone Crusher vs Gyratory Crusher
مخروط محطم

أداء, كفاءة, and Cost Factors

الإنتاجية & كفاءة

Gyratory crusher can process substantially larger volumes and massive rock, but often at higher energy and maintenance cost. Cone crusher, with their steeper chambers and faster cycling, is generally more energy-efficient for smaller aggregate production.

Product Quality

  • gyratory: Coarser product, higher chance of uncrushed fines in the output.
  • مخروط: Consistently cubical product, ideal for concrete and asphalt plants.

صيانة & مصداقية

  • gyratory: More downtime for routine maintenance (liner changes, shaft adjustments). Service is almost always via the top; space and lift equipment are needed.
  • مخروط: Easier forced lubrication, modern hydraulic automated settings, more accessible wear part replacement, and overall cheaper to maintain.

Typical Product Specifications for Reference

نموذجالحد الأقصى لحجم التغذيةحجم الإنتاجسعة (TPH)قوة المحرك (كيلوواط)
كسارة مخروطية HST275مم4-41مم45-213090-630
HPT Multi-cylinder330مم6-38مم100-790110-500
CS Spring Cone278مم3-64مم27-140075-400
كسارة مخروطية1200mm*150mm*حتى 5000*300–1000*

*Representative industry values; actual specs depend on manufacturer and model.

Selecting between acone crusher vs. gyratory crusher means balancing feed, throughput, فضاء, cost, and product requirements. Make a choice aligned with long-term goals for reliability, كفاءة, and high-quality output. Don’t hesitate to reach out to engineers or trusted suppliers for tailored recommendations—they can help you avoid expensive mistakes and boost your bottom line.

المكتب الرئيسي

واتس اب:+8615225176731

بريد إلكتروني: [email protected]

عنوان: لا. 1688, طريق جاوك الشرقي, حي بودونغ الجديد, شنغهاي, الصين.

موقع إلكتروني: https://www.mill-sbm.com/

محتويات المادة