Home » Blog » Impact Crusher or Jaw Crusher for Hard Rock Materials

Impact Crusher or Jaw Crusher for Hard Rock Materials

Impact Crusher or Jaw Crusher for Hard Rock
Impact Crusher or Jaw Crusher for Hard Rock

For hard, highly abrasive rock (granite, basalt, quartz‑rich ores), a jaw crusher is the better choice for primary crushing, while impact crushers are generally not recommended as the main machine.

When to use a jaw crusher?

  • Jaw crushers use compression and are designed specifically to handle very hard, tough materials like granite, basalt and hard ores at the primary stage.​
  • They accept large feed sizes, have high throughput and lower wear costs in abrasive hard rock compared with impact crushers, though the product is coarser and more flaky.

When (and how) to use an impact crusher?

  • Impact crushers rely on high‑speed impact and are best for medium‑hard to soft, less abrasive rock such as limestone, clay, and many recycled materials, where they give excellent cubic shape and high reduction ratio.​
  • Using an impact crusher as the main machine on very hard, abrasive rock quickly wears blow bars and liners, sharply increasing wear‑part cost and downtime; if used, it is usually as a secondary/tertiary stage after a jaw or cone to improve shape.

Hard rock choice summary

AspectJaw crusher (hard rock)Impact crusher (hard rock)
Crushing principleCompression between fixed and moving jaws​High‑speed blow bars against impact plates​
Suitable materialsVery hard, abrasive (granite, basalt, ores)​Generally medium‑hard, less abrasive; hard rock only in selected cases with high wear​
Typical positionPrimary crusher in hard rock plants​Secondary/tertiary or shaping, not main primary for very hard rock​
Product shapeCoarser, more flaky, less cubic​Very cubic, good gradation​
Wear and OPEX in hard rockLower wear cost, more economical in abrasive rock​High wear rate and higher cost per ton in abrasive rock​
Rock type & hardnessMax feed (mm)Capacity target (t/h)Main product size (mm)Recommended SBM configurationModel‑level notes
Granite / basalt (very hard)600–700120–1800–31.5Primary: PE600×900 / PE750×1060 jaw + Secondary: HST160 cone + Tertiary: HST160 (short head) if neededPE‑series jaws are suitable for primary crushing of hard rocks like granite and basalt; HST160 handles hard rock secondary/tertiary with high efficiency.
Granite / basalt (high‑capacity plant)700–900250–4000–25Primary: PE900×1200 jaw + Secondary: HPT300 multi‑cylinder cone + Tertiary: HPT300 / HPT400Large PE jaws accept big feed; HPT cones are recommended by SBM for hard‑rock mining with high throughput and lower operating cost.
Hard quartzite / iron ore500–650180–26010–40Primary: PE750×1060 jaw + Secondary: HST250 coneDeep‑chamber PE jaws from SBM are designed for harsh rocks and industrial minerals; HST250 gives precise CSS control for 10–40 mm products.
Gneiss / hard sandstone350–500100–1800–20Primary: PE600×900 jaw + Secondary: HST160 cone + Shaping: CI5X impact (optional)Jaw + HST160 do main reduction; CI5X impactor is used only as a shaping stage to boost cubicity where needed.
Medium‑hard limestone500–700180–2800–25Primary: PE750×1060 jaw or CI5X primary impact + Secondary: CI5X impactFor limestone, SBM often uses impact crushers as key machines; CI5X series provides high reduction and good shape for aggregates.
Medium‑hard limestone (finer products)300–45080–1500–10Single‑stage CI5X impact or two‑stage CI5X in closed circuit with screenCI5X impact crusher is described as efficient, low‑cost equipment for medium‑hard rock and aggregates, suitable for high‑fines production.​
Dolomite / soft sandstone250–40070–1305–25Primary: PE500×750 jaw + Secondary: CI5X impactPE500×750 has a 425 mm max feed and 45–100 t/h capacity, ideal as a compact primary; CI5X secondary impact refines to 5–25 mm.
River pebble / gravel (abrasive)300–500120–2000–20Primary: PE600×900 jaw + Secondary: HST160 cone + Optional VSI6X for shapingJaw + HST160 handle abrasive pebbles; VSI‑type or similar vertical‑shaft impactor from SBM is added only for final shaping and sand.
Soft limestone / marl400–60080–1500–31.5Single CI5X impact with vibrating screenFor soft, low‑abrasive limestone, SBM recommends impact‑centric lines; one CI5X can act as primary and secondary in a compact plant.
Recycled concrete with rebar400–60080–1500–32Primary: PE600×900 jaw + Secondary: CI5X impactPE jaw handles rebar and big blocks; CI5X improves particle shape for recycled aggregate in base and concrete.
Asphalt millings / RAP≤300 (pre‑milled)80–1500–16Single CI5X impact in closed circuitImpact crusher is suitable for asphalt and similar soft–medium materials, with adjustable rotor speed and curtain gaps.
Mixed C&D waste (concrete, brick)300–50080–1500–40Primary: PE500×750 or PE600×900 jaw + Secondary: CI5X impactCompact PE jaw as first breaker; CI5X secondary for controlled size and better gradation; presorting system recommended.​
Capacity range(≈50–100 t/h)Rock type & hardnessMax feed (mm)Target product (mm)Suggested configuration (SBM‑style)Notes
Small hard‑rock quarryGranite / basalt (hard)350–4500–25Primary: PE500×750 jaw + Secondary: HST100 / small conePE500×750 (45–100 t/h) is a classic small primary; HST100 cone refines to 0–25 mm for concrete aggregates.
Hard sandstone / gneissHard, moderately abrasive300–4000–20Primary: PE400×600 / PE500×750 jaw + Secondary: HST100 coneCompact jaw plus single‑cylinder cone suits small quarry lines in the 60–90 t/h band.​
Medium‑hard limestoneMedium hardness, low abrasion300–4000–25Single CI5X impact or primary PE400×600 + CI5X impactFor softer limestone, small CI5X impactor can do primary+secondary; jaw is optional if feed is blocky.​
Dolomite / soft sandstoneMedium250–3505–25Primary: PE400×600 / PE500×750 jaw + Secondary: CI5X impactJaw gives control on feed size; CI5X provides cubic aggregates at modest wear cost in this capacity range.​
Small C&D / concrete recyclingConcrete with rebar250–3500–32Primary: PE400×600 / PE500×750 jaw + Secondary: small CI5X impactJaw removes rebar and big lumps; secondary impact improves shape and liberates mortar at 50–100 t/h. 
Capacity range(≈100–200 t/h)Rock type & hardnessMax feed (mm)Target product (mm)Suggested configuration (SBM‑style)Notes
Standard hard‑rock plantGranite / basalt (very hard)500–6500–31.5Primary: PE600×900 / PE750×1060 jaw + Secondary: HST160 conePE600×900 and PE750×1060 cover 80–180 t/h; HST160 cone as secondary suits 10–40 mm output for base and concrete.​
High‑quality concrete aggregateGranite / gneiss450–6000–25Primary: PE750×1060 jaw + Secondary: HPT200 / HPT300 coneHPT multi‑cylinder cones are positioned for high‑quality aggregates; in 150–200 t/h they give good shape and throughput.​
200 t/h limestone lineMedium‑hard limestone500–7000–5 / 5–10 / 10–31.5Primary: PE750×1060 or CI5X primary impact + Secondary: CI5X impact + Vibrating screensSBM 200 t/h limestone cases use primary + secondary impact with multi‑fraction screens for 0–5, 5–10, 10–31.5 mm.​
River pebble / gravelHard, abrasive350–5000–20Primary: PE600×900 jaw + Secondary: HST160 cone + Optional VSI6X shapingJaw + cone handle abrasion; VSI‑type stage is added only where sand and extra cubicity are required.​
Recycled concrete & asphaltMedium hardness350–5000–25 / 0–32Primary: PE600×900 jaw + Secondary: CI5X impact (closed circuit)100–200 t/h mobile or stationary recycling lines often use jaw + HSI to balance throughput and product quality. 
Capacity range(≈200–400 t/h)Rock type & hardnessMax feed (mm)Target product (mm)Suggested configuration (SBM‑style)Notes
Large hard‑rock quarryGranite / basalt (very hard)650–9000–25 / 0–31.5Primary: PE900×1200 / C6X110 jaw + Secondary: HPT300 / HPT400 cone + Tertiary: HPT300 short‑head if neededC6X/large PE jaws are used for 200–400 t/h primary; HPT cones recommended by SBM for large hard‑rock mining and aggregates.​
High‑spec asphalt & concreteHard rock (granite, gneiss)600–8000–20Primary: C6X110 jaw + Secondary: HPT300 cone + Shaping: VSI6X or CI5X impactJaw + multi‑cylinder cone provide grading; final shaping stage improves flakiness index for premium asphalt mixes.​
300–350 t/h limestone plantMedium‑hard limestone600–8000–5 / 5–10 / 10–20 / 20–31.5Primary: PE900×1200 or C6X110 jaw + Secondary: CI5X impact + Tertiary: CI5X / VSI6X sand makerLarger limestone lines in SBM cases use jaw + 2–stage impact or impact + VSI for multiple aggregate fractions and machine‑made sand.​
Large river pebble / hard gravelHard, highly abrasive400–6000–25Primary: C6X100 / C6X110 jaw + Secondary: HST250 / HPT300 cone + Optional VSI6XEmphasis on robust C6X jaw and wear‑optimized cone for 200–350 t/h; VSI used only where sand demand is high.​
High‑volume C&D / concrete recyclingMixed concrete, brick, asphalt400–6000–32Primary: C6X100 / PE900×1200 jaw + Secondary: CI5X impact (2 units in parallel if needed)For 250–350 t/h recycling hubs, one large jaw feeds one or two CI5X impactors in closed circuit with multi‑deck screens. 

Please tell us a bit about your project – material type, maximum feed size, required capacity, target product size, and any site or terrain limitations. Based on this information, our engineers will quickly recommend the most suitable crushers and a complete solution tailored to your needs.

You can contact us at any time, and our team will get back to you as soon as possible with a clear proposal and quotation.

FAQ: Jaw Crusher vs Impact Crusher

Q1: How do I choose between a jaw crusher and an impact crusher for my material?

A1: The choice mainly depends on material hardness, abrasiveness, and your product size requirements. For very hard, abrasive rock (granite, basalt, quartz), a jaw crusher is usually the best primary machine, often followed by a cone crusher. For medium‑hard or softer, less abrasive materials (limestone, construction waste, asphalt), an impact crusher is ideal for achieving high reduction ratios and good particle shape.

Q2: What information do you need to recommend a suitable crushing solution?

A2: To recommend the right configuration, it is important to know: material type and hardness, maximum feed size, required production capacity (t/h), desired product size range, and any site or mobility constraints. With these details, engineers can match appropriate jaw, cone, and impact crusher models and design a complete, efficient process flow.

Q3: Can one crusher type handle both hard rock and construction waste?

A3: In most cases, a single crusher type cannot work optimally for both extreme hard rock and mixed construction waste. For hard rock, a jaw‑and‑cone combination is usually preferred for durability and lower wear costs. For construction and demolition recycling, a jaw plus impact crusher setup (or a primary impactor) is typically more efficient for handling rebar, producing better‑shaped recycled aggregates, and meeting road base or concrete specifications.

Article Contents